Pluckrose et al exposed the fake intellectuals and neo-Maxists so nicely they cant get over it. Just watch this person.
-
-
-
Neo-Marxism is nonsense, tho.
-
I would like to hear your opinion why it is so popular. It seems even BBC is pushing it. Weird
-
I could be wrong, but I think she meant "neo-Marxism", the label, is bullshit, i.e. meaningless.
-
Yes. I will be arguing this at the Battle of Ideas on Saturday and I will write it up afterwards.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wow the responses to your research might be as interesting and telling as the research itself.
-
It is, very. The common refrain is that it cast doubt on the, nominally, legitimate research. Yes, detractors, that is the crux of the matter: no qualitative difference discriminates satire from salient in a field with no standards beyond toeing the line.
-
This research should have been done decades ago. It might be too late as some universities have "diversity depts" and other ways to insure that the church of feminism is upheld in the university. Jonathan Haidt & the heterodox academy and others R at least trying 2 combat this.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Elmyra highlights the very problem Pluckrose, et al. exposed: the sheer inability to distinguish between ridiculous, rear-extracted, pabulum and a purposeful hoax. These are not fields creating, and refining, a body of knowledge, but make-work schemes for mostly useless degrees.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think Dr Stealing your jobs is going to be stealing your job anytime soon,
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah - what the hell?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.