Also, "core ideas not unreasonable" per the journal is the exact OPPOSITE of a straw man. You didn't exaggerate and attack the exaggeration, you took a pure fiction inspired by total nonsense, used house style and methodology, and let the journals do the rest. Bravo.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One GOOD argument I think can be made in rebuttal to the criticism of being "outside the discipline". For an actual discipline, this is impossible - either practically or definitionally. Scholarship should require formal training. I can't spoof a math paper. I just CAN'T!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’ve been enjoying this one! It’s actually come down to them defending your own paper and telling YOU it had merit even though you aren’t smart enough to see it, and that you weren’t really doing what you think you did, Jfc





well doneThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.