What does this mean? If you accept that the editorial process failed by allowing bad ideas to be published, surely you accept that the ideas were bad? Or is there some other problem? Perhaps that they didn't check our identities?https://twitter.com/willwilkinson/status/1050055981827313664 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
my objection to the "hoax" is that you are presenting it as an experiment or an ethnographic exercise (not sure which) but don't have the level of discipline required. For example, if it is an experiment then you would have been required to enter about 30 papers to a
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GodsBeagle @HPluckrose
randomly selected (not your choice) set of journals and have a hypothesis about the result including an H1 and an H2 result. If it was ethnography (laying aside the ethical question) you again would have needed a properly qualitative study of
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @GodsBeagle
That doesn't make any sense in the context of the investigation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I simply don't think your "investigation" meets the standards of an investigation - is the short form.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
I don't understand your objections or how they relate to what we actually did or our rationale for doing so. I can only suggest you read the Areo piece and see what we are and are not looking at and claiming.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.