What does this mean? If you accept that the editorial process failed by allowing bad ideas to be published, surely you accept that the ideas were bad? Or is there some other problem? Perhaps that they didn't check our identities?https://twitter.com/willwilkinson/status/1050055981827313664 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
my objection to the "hoax" is that you are presenting it as an experiment or an ethnographic exercise (not sure which) but don't have the level of discipline required. For example, if it is an experiment then you would have been required to enter about 30 papers to a
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GodsBeagle @HPluckrose
randomly selected (not your choice) set of journals and have a hypothesis about the result including an H1 and an H2 result. If it was ethnography (laying aside the ethical question) you again would have needed a properly qualitative study of
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @GodsBeagle @HPluckrose
both the peer reviews and if possible the peer reviewers i.e. not only what remarks they made but why they made them. Some of their remarks are revealing e.g. they see peer review as constructive not destructive. Finally, you need to
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @GodsBeagle @HPluckrose
acknowledge that some of the rejections were pretty solid - showing that while you may not agree with the standards of knowledge in the field, it does actually have standards of knowledge. So my issue is not carrying out a "hoax" but
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GodsBeagle @HPluckrose
claiming the hoax is some kind of experiment while failing yourselves to demonstrate any experimental standards or methodologies.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
We've been very clear about what kind of investigation it is, that it is not controlled and what it can and cannot show. I can only recommend that you read the Areo piece which discusses this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.