my objection to the "hoax" is that you are presenting it as an experiment or an ethnographic exercise (not sure which) but don't have the level of discipline required. For example, if it is an experiment then you would have been required to enter about 30 papers to a
-
-
-
randomly selected (not your choice) set of journals and have a hypothesis about the result including an H1 and an H2 result. If it was ethnography (laying aside the ethical question) you again would have needed a properly qualitative study of
-
That doesn't make any sense in the context of the investigation.
-
I simply don't think your "investigation" meets the standards of an investigation - is the short form.
-
What would like us to call it?
-
PiltdownSquared
-
I don't understand your objections or how they relate to what we actually did or our rationale for doing so. I can only suggest you read the Areo piece and see what we are and are not looking at and claiming.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just as real communism has never been tried, that jargon has never been properly used and those theories have never been correctly taught and or implemented, so you are critiquing these flawed attempts at Utopia.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't waste too much of your time trying to follow or respond to Will Wilkinson. It's like trying to get nourishment from diet soda.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.