I’d suggest his point is a lot of pub’d “maximally rigorous” philosophy is equally subject to spoofing. I’d agree that a lot of published philosophy is easily spoofed, but wld argue, as Caplin did of S^2, that easily spoofed is strong indication of not being “maximally rigorous”
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just check this thread where he, at the end, decided to block me. https://twitter.com/Sneaky_Disease/status/1027255581784989696 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.