Then publish a critique of the errors constructivism in Philosophy of Science or the American Sociological Review? Everyone can opine on the internet, but that's not the authority of credible, vetted expertise. If you're so keen to defend that authority, show that you have it.
-
-
-
This is telling Picasso to show he's a great artist by painting something like the Mona Lisa. But comparative advantage is real. The Sokal Squared team did something great, that's enough for one lifetime.




Let a thousand methodological flowers bloom





- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I am very sympathetic to the project but centring reason is not a value-free approach, and there are several decades of continental philosophy to contend with in this statement (not just Foucault, Derrida et al).
-
Not to mention millennia of philosophical curiosity about what reason is, and what are its instrumental consequences.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.