That is precisely the point we are trying to show. These papers didn't get in because of carelessness or fluke. They got in because peer review genuinely favours these ideas & even requires them. We've been saying this for years and being accused of strawmanning identity studies. https://twitter.com/JohnQPublic100/status/1050046512233926656 …
-
-
Ha ha, E, lol, equals, chuckle, M, I can hardly contain myself, C, look at these idiots, chuckle chuckle, squared.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It has had an effect on non academics also. We're much less like to cede to the authority of someone showing PhD credentials in these dubious subjects I've seen people refuse to debate non academics on identity issues, speaking of not being here to educate the ignorant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would hope this has an effect, but it may be more effective to argue that lax epistemology is actually a threat to the social justice values they hold dear. Their discourse is itself a system of power which prevents uncovering of truth about social justice.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.