That is precisely the point we are trying to show. These papers didn't get in because of carelessness or fluke. They got in because peer review genuinely favours these ideas & even requires them. We've been saying this for years and being accused of strawmanning identity studies. https://twitter.com/JohnQPublic100/status/1050046512233926656 …
-
-
Therefore, our papers will not have much impact on the people who know this is already happening and think it's great. We hope it will have some impact on the people, mostly liberal academics, who have been telling us this isn't really happening & scholarship is still rigorous.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I haven’t a rashers what you just said, but going on your track record the odds are that it’s sensible as hell, so
.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.