That is precisely the point we are trying to show. These papers didn't get in because of carelessness or fluke. They got in because peer review genuinely favours these ideas & even requires them. We've been saying this for years and being accused of strawmanning identity studies. https://twitter.com/JohnQPublic100/status/1050046512233926656 …
-
-
Our papers do not show that it is bad to work on an epistemology which believes that knowledge is a construct of power perpetuated by discourse. It shows that this epistemology is perfectly acceptable and even required within certain subdisciplines.
Show this thread -
Therefore, our papers will not have much impact on the people who know this is already happening and think it's great. We hope it will have some impact on the people, mostly liberal academics, who have been telling us this isn't really happening & scholarship is still rigorous.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.