It is probably true to say that we mastered it better in gender studies fields than in race ones but don't overlook that our feminist stuff is intersectional so incorporates critical race theory and our feminist epistemology includes critical race epistemology.
-
-
Show this thread
-
I think it would be more true to say that we managed to get more acceptance of papers which problematized masculinity than anything else. We wrote about that in the New Statesman.pic.twitter.com/bIuhzLVGw2
Show this thread -
However, there is a problem with looking at the project in terms only of papers accepted or likely to be accepted. More can be gleaned by looking at the hundreds of papers we cited to enable us to make the claims we did & the reviews & how they consistently directed us.
Show this thread -
I disagree most strongly with the ethical criticisms. We did have to fake our identities and motivations. If we'd sent in the papers with our names & stated that our intention was to get bad papers published, the project would have ended there. Sometimes you have to go undercover
Show this thread -
And I don't agree that, if this kind of hoax became widespread, it would be the hoaxing that undermined confidence in peer review. It would still be whether or not the peer review process successfully weeded out papers that were unsound and unethical.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A questionable aspect of the Heterodox piece is seeming to grant a higher degree of credibility to a field due to the fact that the trio truly had to learn the language of the field. But the same could be said of Scientology, or any religion. The why of the language is left blank
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The parallel has long existed in visual arts under postmodernism: ostensibly it's all "anything goes" now, to the outside viewer, but in reality the gatekeepers have very clear criteria: no modernism (that's over, doncha know?), only art that "explores issues" from a leftist POV.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have two college aged children. In high school and for college appls, they wrote lots of essays. Both talked about the sjw prompts given. My daughter was great at feeding “readers” what they wanted to hear. My son, not so much. Grades reflected that. Different opinion not okay
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Very important point! You have to pay lip service to the politics and know the "lore" in order to publish anything in those fields.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think your initial rejections followed by a rousing success rate correlate well with your claim.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I haven't read your whole situation, did you intentionally target lower impact-factor journals to expose the problem this way? Or was it, as it has been characterized, an attack on gender and race studies in general? If the latter, I don't see the utility. If the former, great.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
https://www.pdcnet.org/C1257B82005A7B6C/file/A70140B8B305A70B8525826B006A6E2D/$FILE/philtoday_2018_0062_0001_0077_0092.pdf … Recently Tuvel's paper was scrutinized in the philosophic sense and there were legit criticisms, this is her response. This is how the response should have looked if the response was from people familiar with philosophy and thought experiments.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.