I went deep into feminist epistemology and James into masculinity studies and Peter into fat studies. We suffered so you don't have to. Christlike is our sacrifice.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
That's what critics were pointing out from day one. Your sacrifice was pointless, it achieves nothing and to make matters even dumber you sacrificed on your own altar. Why didn't you choose side of legitimate scientific inquiry.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Christ sacrificed himself so he could save humanity from his own wrath, which was dumb because as God he could save people by other means like say education. What I'm trying to say is, I'm deeply disappointed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
IMO if you want to show that some areas of scholarship are fraudulent you have to go after them by disproving main theories, criticise main arguments etc. Even if they don't listen or engage, people don't publish hoax studies that vaccines cause autism for a reason after all
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @filth_and
We've been doing that for years. I am currently writing a book on it. People deny that the problem exists. We wanted to show that it does by getting papers published which draw on main theories and arguments.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @filth_and
I don't know what is pseudoscience about what we did? Why shouldn't we test our claim that epistemologically poor ideologically biased papers are being not only accepted but encouraged by certain journals? You've said what we should do but not why doing this too was wrong.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Getting paper published doesn't disprove main tenets of say radical feminism. Careful examination/criticism of existing theories/arguments/studies does.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Radical feminism is dead in the water. The intersectionals rule now. No, showing this problem to exist needs to happen as well as arguing against it. We've spent a lot of time on the latter but many people doubted that it really was a problem in academia. We needed to show it is
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.