In addition to his job of doing some of everything & directing the project strategically, James had to spend a lot of energy on reining in Peter's wicked imagination & humour and my obsessive attention to theoretical detail & making them cohere.
-
-
Again you are showing that the process is flawed. You didn't disprove theory.
-
It's not an attempt to "disprove theory." It's an attempt to show that epistemologically poor and ideological motivated scholarship is required in certain fields. You are v confused about the purpose of the project but we have set it out at length so I'm not explaining again here
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Getting paper published doesn't disprove main tenets of say radical feminism. Careful examination/criticism of existing theories/arguments/studies does.
-
Radical feminism is dead in the water. The intersectionals rule now. No, showing this problem to exist needs to happen as well as arguing against it. We've spent a lot of time on the latter but many people doubted that it really was a problem in academia. We needed to show it is
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.