The Constitution bars any law “prohibiting the free exercise” of religion. The argument is that laws that conflict with a “genuinely held” religious belief/practice must give way because enforcement would prohibit the “free exercise” of religion. So yes, religious privilege.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The legal phrase for it is "reasonable accommodation".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not really. A Sabbath is a day for worship (and rest) mandated by a diety. To me a religious freedom protection is accommodation that leaves the person able to practice the requirements of their faith, such as permitting a Muslim a prayer rug in the workplace and a break to pray
-
BUT, religious commands should only dictate what a believer of that faith should do. Not the rest of the population.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.