because its origin is not dependent on chromosomal sex. It is, however, biological, hardwired into the brain. And I mean brain, the physical organ, not some nebulous concept of mind. There have been a number of studies done in neurology and the like, hard sciences, which have
-
-
However, there are also the ethics. Mine are liberal which means I will defend your right to define 'woman' as widely or narrowly as you like and also other people's to disagree with you. You can survive people disagreeing with you or even being wrong.
-
Sweet Jesus, you obviously aren’t even trying to understand my point.
-
Mine is different. I am essentially telling you to believe what you want and asking you not to go on about it to people who aren't interested and accept disagreement.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And you can choose to define 'woman' purely by feelings, fashion choices and behavior. I pretty sure transgender women will love it!
-
People can choose to do that too, yes. I said this about it which urges going with the science, addressing practical issues & leaving people alone: https://areomagazine.com/2017/09/27/an-argument-for-a-liberal-and-rational-approach-to-transgender-rights-and-inclusion/ … You can't force everyone to agree with you. I am not interested in having this discussion yet again.
-
Rejection of logic and objective standards will bring chaos and nothing more. We can pretend that physical, sexual differences between two sexes don't exist, but inevitably we'll get smacked in the face by reality at some point.
-
Again, you are not responding to anything that has been said. I am advocating going with the science. No-one is advocating pretending it doesn't exist. Go argue with people who do. I won't see any more of your tweets.
-
"I'am advocating going with the science" - are u sure?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.