I admit to cursory engagement with the book - I cannot read it right now & get back to you - but when its summaries explicitly state that they critique of neuroscience for identifying differences & advocate focusing on the social, I can say this is not evidence of what I advocate
Of course, it is possible that the summary & blurb are misleading & inside they actually advocate an acceptance of the science of gender difference and advocate a focus on gender equality & gender relations which takes this into account but then I think they'd say so.