I've always thought this a strange argument. Knowing how we feel the most positive of emotions means they're not real? Very odd. Does this mean that a beautiful vista stops being beautiful if we know our eyes work?https://twitter.com/ctlansdown/status/1004328190180020224 …
Narcissism because I'll love my child because its my child and not because she and I are important to the almighty creator of the universe? Hmmm. I'll keep it simple.
-
-
Because your feelings matter more than reality.
-
My feelings are the subject under discussion, remember? My love for my child is the reality of my feelings. You posit that a god also exists which is a meaning you have added to those feelings. Other people add other gods or philosophical or poetic meaning.
-
Your argument essentially comes down to 'I give my feelings this additional religious meaning and no-one else can possibly have any meaning unless its the same as my meaning.' This is just an assertion of your own rightness.
-
But it's silly to say you feel sorry for atheists because they must realise their own feelings are meaningless because they'd only think so if they attributed meaning in the same way as you do and then they wouldn't be atheists. They'd be Catholics.
-
I said that I feel sorry for the atheists who *do* realize this meaninglessness, I didn't say that I felt sorry for all atheists.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.