It is incoherent to expect me to be able to name people who disagree with me reasonably on issues & values. When I find someone's objection to my reasoning reasonable, I change my own mind on the issue & we are no longer in disagreement.
-
Show this thread
-
I can find someone generally reasonable, their argument coherent & their intentions good but if we differ on an issue, it'd be nonsense to say 'Your disagreement with my argument is reasonable & yet I'm not going to change or adapt my argument in consideration of your reasoning.'
4 replies 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
In this case, my argument is that intersectionality - politics plus postmodern theory - is the wrong way to address social injustice. If someone comes along & makes a well-reasoned argument that it is the right way to address social injustice, I'll no longer make that argument.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
People occasionally say to me they find me reasonable but often disagree with me. I take this to mean that they think me a reasonable person generally & so follow me but that they think there are some exceptions to this. I doubt they mean 'I think you're reasonable to be wrong.'
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I think it's rather an issue of personal values and beliefs than reason. For example: You: "Pork should never be eaten raw, bc it can contain parasites." Me: "That is a reasonable argument, but I disagree with you bc I think mett (raw pork) is delicious."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CharlMcDuck @HPluckrose
After that exchange, I'm in disagreement with you, but I still think you make reasonable arguments that deserve consideration without changing my position on the topic at all.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, that's an entirely different thing. I wish I'd never brought this up now.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.