Yes, but if they disagree with me on the issues & values I hold, I can't coherently consider them reasonable on those issues & values. If I did, I'd change my own to them & we'd no longer be in disagreement. I could find them reasonable more broadly if we disagree on one thing.
-
-
This is all very well and good, but it isn't true that what you call postmosernism has "invaded" universities, a claim at tension with your claim that the "postmodern" left is a fringr minority. Furthermore you seem to imply that theorists tou disagree with shouldn't be taught.
-
It is this hostility to intellectual opponents that I disagree with and find to be no less a forn of "moral panic" than the "identity politics" scourge you claim has invaded universities. I'll let this be my last word on where we disagree. I'm sure we agree on much else.
-
Perhaps we can also agree Twitter would be improved with some form of mechanism to edit typos.
-
Indeed! I am completely on board with civil disagreement but I also think we need to argue for and against ideas vigorously.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.