Yeah, reality is messy. We have to go with what people actually do and say when we're looking at an evolvong ideology rather than with concepts read in most charitable light.
Yes, but if they disagree with me on the issues & values I hold, I can't coherently consider them reasonable on those issues & values. If I did, I'd change my own to them & we'd no longer be in disagreement. I could find them reasonable more broadly if we disagree on one thing.
-
-
We disagree. I take it we are able to do so because of reasonableness and not despite it.
-
I have not heard any arguments from you for intersectionality. I have no idea what your reasoning abilities are like. So far, I only know that you are polite and have not said anything unreasonable.
-
I agree with Crenshaw's use of the term. I think it misleading to paint it as an ideology invading humanities departments. I think social justice and identity politics ought not be used as derisive descriptions--and that being unreasonable and irrational are different things.
-
Finally (I'm going to bed) the fact that some are now attempting to dismiss concern over climate change as rooted in "social justice identity politics" illustrates one additional reason I cringe every time I hear hasty generalizations being made about such concepts. Goodnight.
-
Yes, but we've never disagreed about the problem of making hasty generalizations about concepts.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.