You just did, mate.
Show me. In the interview he says that genetics has not been established as the cause of repeated data showing difference and argues that individuality matters more than race citing Obama as an example of why racist stereotyping re intelligence doesn't work.
-
-
"We’re not talking about another 20 years before the purely environmental position is discredited, but probably less than a decade." Talking about the gap. http://www.aei.org/publication/bell-curve-20-years-later-qa-charles-murray/ … Charles Murray believes black people are, on average, genetically inferior to white people.
-
Interesting. Not what is said in the podcast. Nevertheless, do you think this shld never be discussed? What if IQ does vary by race/ethnicity with Asians & Jews at the top, whites in the middle & Africans at the bottom? Tells us nothing about any individual. Shld it be forbidden?
-
Charles Murray has built his entire career on this. It is being discussed. Lots of people study this constantly, which is how we know about the Flynn effect and such. We can deal with that issue when and if it is proven.
-
Nah. It's one chapter of his book and after including race in his exploration of IQ, he was persona non grata everywhere.
-
He really wasn't. The guy has had a high profile career for decades: https://www.vox.com/2018/4/10/17182692/bell-curve-charles-murray-policy-wrong … The Bell Curve is a policy treatise arguing that IQ survey data justifies social policies limiting reproduction among poor people and immigrants. It is a gross, disgusing book.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.