Entirely depends on how you define women. If by gonads, no, if by sense of themselves, yes. This is the pointless semantic argument that goes on and on.
Yes, and I support your right to feel that and say so. Other people don't feel that and will continue to think in terms of gender as separate from sex and continue to be happy to identify as they wish to be identified. This is why I come down ultimately to the freedom issue.
-
-
You mean there should be no set definition of gender and each person should define it in one's own way? I certainly support people behaving as they wish, but it seems important to me for things to be defined in concrete ways to facilitate discussion and scientific investigation.
-
It'd be lovely if everyone agreed about this. They don't tho.
-
But you see a person's gender as separate from their sex? I would like to understand this concept but when I try to follow the logic of it I just hit a tangle of paradoxes. It doesn't seem like individual gender identity in this sense can actually be defined.
-
Yes. I do. I understand what is meant by 'a very masculine man' or 'a feminine woman' or 'an effeminate man' or 'a mannish woman.' But, seriously, it doesn't matter if you don't. I just don't care enough to try to convince you. I'd only hope you'd let other people think so.
-
That's disappointing that you don't want to help me understand that viewpoint but thanks for your time. Maybe at some point someone can explain it to me. Obviously I know what is meant by those terms as well but I don't see how that supports independent sex and gender identity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.