Scientism has occurred in the past and I think it re-emerged with the advent of new atheism. Every great thing you have to say about science is something I’ll agree with (just look at my bio). But I’m also someone who questions everything before accepting it as fact.
-
-
I don't agree about the New Atheists but I do think questioning everything and accepting that knowledge is always provisional and making efforts to disprove things we thought were true are central to science.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I’ll exclude Harris, Dennett, & Hitchens from my original claim. But I’ve witnessed it w/Krauss, Shermer, Dawkins, Pinker, and at times N.G. Tyson. And it pains me because I’m fans of virtually all of them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Scientism in Pinker?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That appears to be an uncharitable reading of this which is much more nuanced and could not justly be called 'scientism' in the sense that it is criticised. Believing science already has all the answers.https://newrepublic.com/article/114127/science-not-enemy-humanities …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I’ve read that one and I agree. But these people are human beings too and capable of the same mistakes we all make. I don’t think Pinker is as bad as Krauss tho. In my view, Krauss makes science seem ideological to me, which is something I thought was impossible.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
That's what the one you posted is responding to tho and I don't understand it. Pinker is humble here. This is the 'scientism' he defends and I am with him.pic.twitter.com/U2Ru3ZBATe
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That’s great, but he’s also redefining the term. There’s a reason why the term scientism is a pejorative. He can say all that w/o calling it scientism and defending its meaning.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SOhawkins21 @HPluckrose and
I think the Scientific American one is pretty charitable to him and much more spot one. The first link I sent you is from a guy who is both a biologist and philosopher.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It was the latter, I read.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.