

yeah I agree. I think the criticism of it is overly simplified. I don’t agree w/everything postmodernist say, but I’m also not going to denigrate an entire field of study & scholarship simply because of political differences; while placing science on the top of the alter
I always reserve judgement when someone mentions philosophy. What follows can be a rigorous and logical argument seeking to clarify complex issues or complete fluffy woo made deliberately obscure. I think I might like your approach to it. Scientism is anti-science.
-
-
Yeah, that’s completely understandable. Dennett himself has said philosophy is needed to protect from scientific overreach. Plus, life is vast. Not everything is going to be reduced to tabulations, test tubes, and MRI scans.
-
No, we need people to be doing that stuff properly so we can call on it in to inform ethics & policy etc. I am interested in ideology & culture. Previously, late medieval & early modern but I've been stuck in the present for a while now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.