In case you didn’t notice blocking people for arguing with your friend is about the nostvintekkectually lazy and dishonest and pathetic thing I can think except for maybe defending someone who does that. But thanks for coming out chief 
-
-
And Peterson is a Jungian psychologist. If that is a scientist, it is a very different kind to a neuroscientist.
-
That’s fair. Would you say that Harris reasons is epistemological (which I’m sympathetic to) and Peterson’s is (political)?
-
Yes, very much so. Harris' epistemology is Newtonian and Peterson's is Darwinian. Because the latter is pragmatic, it has much more in common with the kind of motivated reasoning found in the branches of activism he criticises.
-
I thought with Peterson, the main political issue (outside of free speech) was about feminism (the idea that sex/gender essentialism in non-existent)
-
Yes, but because both feminist social constructivism and Peterson's narrative constructivism are pragmatic, they both seek to find what suits their narratives & explain it with overarching, moralistic metanarratives.
-
That is spot certainly spot on
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
