Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
HPluckrose's profile
Helen Pluckrose
Helen Pluckrose
Helen Pluckrose
@HPluckrose

Tweets

Helen Pluckrose

@HPluckrose

Editor @AreoMagazine Secular, liberal humanist. Mother. Doglover. Writing book about epistemology & ethics on the academic left Helen.pluckrose@areomagazine.com

London.
areomagazine.com/author/hpluckr…
Joined August 2011

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Bimbos&BodyBuilders‏ @femalestuds Jun 3
      Replying to @michaelshermer @clairlemon @JonHaidt

      Claire is a total fraud. Exactly what she claims to dislike. She blocked me for arguing, and winning an argument against her friend and fellow fraud @HPluckrose . I still like Quillette but this is why they say don’t meet people you admire. They’ll let you down.

      2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
    2. Silvio Capobianco‏ @capobianco_slv Jun 3
      Replying to @femalestuds @michaelshermer and

      Just in case you didn't notice: our right to speak does not translate into anyone's duty to listen.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    3. Bimbos&BodyBuilders‏ @femalestuds Jun 3
      Replying to @capobianco_slv @michaelshermer and

      In case you didn’t notice blocking people for arguing with your friend is about the nostvintekkectually lazy and dishonest and pathetic thing I can think except for maybe defending someone who does that. But thanks for coming out chief 🙄

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. Bimbos&BodyBuilders‏ @femalestuds Jun 3
      Replying to @femalestuds @capobianco_slv and

      * most intellectually

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Decadence, Debauchery & Nihilism‏ @SOhawkins21 Jun 3
      Replying to @femalestuds @capobianco_slv and

      What I find interesting is that the IDW, who claim to engage in open discourse, has a following who really can’t think for themselves. Their ideas has to align with at least one person from the IDW, and any criticism automatically makes you a postmodernist.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. David Gorski, MD, PhD‏Verified account @gorskon Jun 3
      Replying to @SOhawkins21 @femalestuds and

      Also, the IDW has no idea what postmodernism really is, as becomes apparent when you read its members' critiques of it. They attack a straw man so massive that, were you to set it on fire, the crew of the International Space Station could see it.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    7. Decadence, Debauchery & Nihilism‏ @SOhawkins21 Jun 3
      Replying to @gorskon @femalestuds and

      😂😂😂yeah I agree. I think the criticism of it is overly simplified. I don’t agree w/everything postmodernist say, but I’m also not going to denigrate an entire field of study & scholarship simply because of political differences; while placing science on the top of the alter

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Jun 3
      Replying to @SOhawkins21 @gorskon and

      I don't think most people do denigrate an entire field tho. I addressed that here in the section about accusations of reductionism.https://areomagazine.com/2018/02/07/no-postmodernism-is-not-dead-and-other-misconceptions/ …

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    9. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Jun 3
      Replying to @HPluckrose @SOhawkins21 and

      No-one is criticising postmodern architecture because it doesn't matter. It is a few key ideas which have evolved through successive waves of critical theory, entered activism trading on the good name of feminism, civil rights movement etc & impacted mainstream social conscience.

      2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
    10. Decadence, Debauchery & Nihilism‏ @SOhawkins21 Jun 3
      Replying to @HPluckrose @gorskon and

      Oh, I was referring to the IDW. Virtually everyone named in that NYT article (and New Atheism by extension), have been critical of POMO in one form or another. Generally speaking you may be correct.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Jun 3
      Replying to @SOhawkins21 @gorskon @capobianco_slv

      They are a mixed bunch but I think the New Atheists are much more likely to be critical of it for valid reasons - epistemology, rather than the 'Neo-Marxism' cobblers, but then these are my people.

      12:21 PM - 3 Jun 2018
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Decadence, Debauchery & Nihilism‏ @SOhawkins21 Jun 3
          Replying to @HPluckrose @gorskon @capobianco_slv

          The diversity of thought it’s evident, especially of you read the NYT article. But that doesn’t negate the idea that most of them have been explicitly against POMO. I know Harris, Peterson, & virtually every scientist in that group is.

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Jun 3
          Replying to @SOhawkins21 @gorskon @capobianco_slv

          Helen Pluckrose Retweeted Helen Pluckrose

          I don't disagree with you about that. I just think they have different reasons for being so and that matters. Peterson & Harris don't have the same problem with it. eg,https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/917921688381263877 …

          Helen Pluckrose added,

          Helen Pluckrose @HPluckrose
          Replying to @theasefountain @GodDoesnt and 2 others
          No. He thinks the notion of objective truth is lingusiticaly constructed, He says so in Maps of Meaning. Confirmed in convo with Harris pic.twitter.com/qsXqVhACcH
          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        4. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Jun 3
          Replying to @HPluckrose @SOhawkins21 and

          And Peterson is a Jungian psychologist. If that is a scientist, it is a very different kind to a neuroscientist.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        5. Decadence, Debauchery & Nihilism‏ @SOhawkins21 Jun 3
          Replying to @HPluckrose @gorskon @capobianco_slv

          That’s fair. Would you say that Harris reasons is epistemological (which I’m sympathetic to) and Peterson’s is (political)?

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        6. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Jun 3
          Replying to @SOhawkins21 @gorskon @capobianco_slv

          Yes, very much so. Harris' epistemology is Newtonian and Peterson's is Darwinian. Because the latter is pragmatic, it has much more in common with the kind of motivated reasoning found in the branches of activism he criticises.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        7. Decadence, Debauchery & Nihilism‏ @SOhawkins21 Jun 3
          Replying to @HPluckrose @gorskon @capobianco_slv

          I thought with Peterson, the main political issue (outside of free speech) was about feminism (the idea that sex/gender essentialism in non-existent)

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        8. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Jun 3
          Replying to @SOhawkins21 @gorskon @capobianco_slv

          Yes, but because both feminist social constructivism and Peterson's narrative constructivism are pragmatic, they both seek to find what suits their narratives & explain it with overarching, moralistic metanarratives.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        9. Decadence, Debauchery & Nihilism‏ @SOhawkins21 Jun 3
          Replying to @HPluckrose @gorskon @capobianco_slv

          That is spot certainly spot on

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        10. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info