Generally speaking, I think we ought to leave people's implicit biases alone and care about what they say & do.There is no right of access to somebody else's head, and any attempt to read what is in there will almost certainly reveal more of the reader's bias than the scrutinised
-
-
Awesome thread
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bravo. Mind-reading of this type is not merely impossible to refute, but is often cynically used to silence discussion (“You can’t talk b/c you’re __.”) It is meant to close down critical thought and compel obedience. It is at its core anti-intellectual.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks Helen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If there were a Nobel Prize for talking sense, you'd be in the running.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree that broadly there has been an obsession with what people say or think and not what they do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is an absolutely fantastic, refreshing & perhaps most importantly, realistic, thread. Thank you for taking the time to tweet something so thoughtful & logical.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, brilliant. And that's one of the more infuriating things about SJWs, their insistence on deciding problem-priority for everyone. Which is also why they savage each other: "MY" issues must pre-empt. The instincts of (moral) commissars.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.