Ah, so it sounds like you haven't read the economics papers. The simple insight you're missing is that those choices are after gender on the causal pathway, so you can't include them as controls to get your estimates. There still is a gap after you account for them, by the way.
Yes, yes, you have explained that stats are worthless here. Therefore, your expertise is irrelevant to the problem at hand. We accept that you can't help so you don't need to remain in the conversation.
-
-
Stats are not worthless- the specific regression you were proposing can not do what you wanted it to do.
-
OK, then, but, in reality, it does matter whether the pay gap is caused by women working less and working different jobs or by discrimination so stats are not of any use for discussing this. You can stop talking about them any time now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.