It's inaccurate to claim the man has made no correct statements, or no empirical statements. And it's naive and foolish to consider him stupid, as many people do. I don't know about "empirically correct", but his discussion of the gender pay gap is certainly empirically grounded.
-
-
what?! his discussion of the gender pay gap is where he gets precipitously owned by actual economists.
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @gztstatistics @kareem_sabri and
Actual economists debunk the gender pay gap routinely!
4 replies 1 retweet 28 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @thatyellowfog and
uh, it's pretty well-established in the literature.
4 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @gztstatistics @HPluckrose and
not worth it. She's an editor at Areo; that mag is conservative culture war bs from front to back, and they love Peterson.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nberlat @gztstatistics and
This kind of dishonestly does not serve you well. Areo is non-partisan, has many leftist writers, including me and has published several pieces critical of Peterson. We've only actually published one which included a positive mention of him.https://areomagazine.com/2018/01/29/the-guru-appeal-of-jordan-peterson-in-our-post-everything-world/ …
5 replies 3 retweets 12 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @nberlat and
So Noah, are you going to retract your comment or not?
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @CathyYoung63 @HPluckrose and
I muted her because she's being ridiculous? which comment are you upset about?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nberlat @HPluckrose and
The one about
@AreoMagazine "loving Peterson." She posted two essays they ran that are critical of him.2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
We recently published one which was positive because we felt a need for balance! (Also, it was very good in its own right)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.