see the Peterson and science section for a number of pretty devastating refutations of Peterson's understanding of lobster biology, the gender pay gap, and personality testing.https://www.patreon.com/posts/jordan-peterson-17972181 …
-
-
Dispense with your tribalism. You actually came into this conversation because I was being critical of Peterson. The fact that I think your kind of indiscriminate hit-job collection actually undermines sincere & thoughtful critique of him does not suddenly make me a fan.
-
This wretched world urgently needs an army of you, Helen. You make sense.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
So Noah, are you going to retract your comment or not?
-
I muted her because she's being ridiculous? which comment are you upset about?
-
The one about
@AreoMagazine "loving Peterson." She posted two essays they ran that are critical of him. -
We recently published one which was positive because we felt a need for balance! (Also, it was very good in its own right)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
It's pretty clear he argues in bad faith and resorts to snide ad hominem. I "look silly" and am a "hoodwinked" JBP "fan" since I said he backs up some of his claims empirically - apparently they believe his claims are *purely* mystical snake oil. If only it were so simple.
-
to be completely fair, the elementary mistake Peterson makes in his discussion of the wage gap is quite common.
-
It's almost like he has no particular expertise...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I see the Berlatsky accusation machine is at it again.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
With Berlatsky, you get used to the reflexive dishonesty.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.