Ok, I haven't read that, but this quote is terrible, and I see it everyday from pedantry, clearly expressed in that angle of Peterson criticism. It's shallow.
You should definitely check rather than taking my word for it. You will find an epistemological difference tho. Rogan hoped that it was a communication difference which could be resolved only to find Peterson adamant on defining truth pragmatically rather than by evidence.
-
-
That isn't a strawman or a misrepresentation of his position tho I understand why you'd suspect this because that happens to him a lot. He really does argue for this being a better way to define truth consistently & his supporters who are familiar with this defend it too.
-
No, that makes sense if he was insistent on that. I would definitely disagree w/ that. Or the way I think of it, what he is calling "true" is like common sense/grammaw wisdom, which I do realize is different than rigorously tested physical science etc. I will check it out, thnx
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.