Competing hypotheses in physics are not evidence of subjective truth. They mean that one or both of them are wrong. Physicists necessarily accept this or they'd never discover anything but just say 'Everybody is right. Let's go home.'https://twitter.com/BraneRunner/status/1000046108784160768 …
That depends on the epistemology for finding truth and the methods for testing it.
-
-
Your core confusion is recognisable 'truth'. If truth isn't recognisable you can't know you've attained it. Yet 'recognisable' assumes prior knowledge of what truth is. The best you can have is consistency (of evidence, methods, epistemology + the relationship between them).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
