No. Things do not become subjective because we cannot prove them. There is a right or wrong answer even if only one person knows what it is. A subjective truth would be if it were true for you that you did not like cilantro but true for me that you did. https://twitter.com/unigolyn/status/1000028601012584448 …
No-one is denying that subjectivity exists, only that truth can be subjective in the sense of believing different things about the same external object which is not just our own perceptions of it. eg God exists for me but not for you. Therefore the existence of God is subjective
-
-
Hmm. I agree. I guess I'm searching for a definition where there might be use of the term. Eg it's objectively true that I bowl right handed but it's not objectively true that all people do (in fact verifiably false) could this be a useful area for that phrase?
-
It's not a useful term. Saying some things are objectively true & some are objectively false is useful. Saying different things are true of different subjects is useful. Saying different subjects may have different perceptions of the same thing is useful.'Subjective truth' is not
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.