Getting rid of the belt in the UK schooling system is partly to blame for the rise of disrespectful jellyfish in society today. That early threat of violence weeded out the real trouble makers from the part-timers. Tbh this is a deeply overlooked factor -
-
-
They would have to stand at the front of the class and receive X amount of belts to the hands. The number depended on the misdemeanour the pupil had committed.
Show this thread -
Of course some teachers were stricter than others and certain sadistic people would have abused it. But consider this - when this was outlawed in 1987 (in the UK)(Scotland was 1998 for some reason)
Show this thread -
But I’m sure most schools stopped it by the early/mid eighties. My grandparents got it, but I’m sure my Parents avoided it. And of course my generation never had to deal with corporal punishment.
Show this thread -
Do you think was a factor in the attitude of people in society? Did removing that fear of physical harm allow millions of pupils to act differently and become bolder in their rebellion against the teachers?
Show this thread -
Was this a key step in the decline of our culture? Or was it the right decision? I know you could argue either way but overall is what I’m looking to judge this upon.
Show this thread -
I just wanted to bring this highly under-researched issue to your attention.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.