I should have stated in the initial tweet - I was referring to spectators of sports more than people who take part in them. Playing sports has many benefits for the players but zero for the consumer.
Show this thread
They gave men sports to replace real battles and tactics. Why do you think football/soccer teams have formations? Sport is a massive hoax to satisfy man's need to do battle with other men. It's a synthetic version of a real battle to the death.
-
-
-
They say when a football team wins the players T levels are boosted and when they lose T levels drop. Ever wonder why woman gravitate to the winner of a fight?
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also good for teamwork at a young age indoctrinating for future military service. Following orders “executing plays”
-
I meant more the viewing of sports rather than playing, which of course has many benefits for people. The spectacular gets nothing of value.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I might be wrong but I remember reading they where invented to teach children about battles/tactics so they would ready for war later in life
-
Perhaps, but what do millions get from viewing sports?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Brushing ice.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Do you not think it's more likely that the sports were developed organically to fill the hole cause by a lack of warfare and conflict
-
It could have been conceptualised to satisfy the hunger for victories!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.