Do you mean the regulations or the statute Genevieve? HIPAA regs have been interpreted by Congress in a statute twice. Once in HITECH and once in Cures (the section on BAs.
-
-
-
Statute. We need new privacy legislation.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Curious what
@HealthPrivacy says, but my read is that patient app is covered, but law office requesting full medical record is not -
But how would a healthcare system tell the difference? If the law firm has an app that looks the same as a patient app, how would you draw that line or possibly know? Meaning what's the difference between apps as third parties? Is it one category or many?
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Direct patient access to their health records is covered/no cost. Most often this is done via patient portal. Other entity requesting such access via 3rd party app needs to pay. Not sure what this means though if a 3rd party app, invoked by patient, must pay for access.
-
Exactly the question...and no one seems to have a great answer yet.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
-
I don't think that's linked with the ruling against HHS really. The patient has the right to use untethered and nothing can force them through an HIE, nor should they be.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
In today’s software world, there’s always code and time between the user’s button push, and the activity it invokes, and that activity may involve several interactions with other agents as directed by, or simply used by the user. Don’t overthink it.
-
Is your phone a “third party”?
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.