Today, Republicans decry a defense topline of $733 billion. But in a letter to the President, 23 of the 26 @HASCRepublicans specifically called for that exact amount. https://bit.ly/31qfYs1 #FY20NDAA (1/3)
-
Show this thread
-
Specifically, the letter said, “We, the undersigned, strongly urge you to uphold your commitment of $733 billion to restore our nation’s military as you complete the fiscal year 2020 President’s Budget.”
#FY20NDAA (2/3)2 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
So, what changed? As he often does, the President made life hard for his own party. He doesn’t like a specific, strategic investment in our national defense. As
@MacTXPress said yesterday, “He likes round numbers, so that's how $750 [billion] got there.”#FY20NDAA (3/3)2 replies 2 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @HASCDemocrats @MacTXPress
(1/3) Our commanders have expressed time and time again that 3-5% real growth is necessary to repair our readiness.
@MacTXPress’ amendment offers specific programs that the#NDAA cut. Members will have the opportunity to support those programs on the record.1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
(2/3)“[W]hen we say 3-5 %, that's to maintain the current competitive advantage…Obv. more resources would result in a more decisive competitive advantage, but we actually identified that as the minimal necessary to make sure we could do what must be done by 2025.”-Gen. Dunford
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like
(3/3) The National Defense Strategy, written by a non-partisan commission, also called for 3-5% real growth. 3% being the bare minimum to keep up with readiness needs and peer adversaries.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.