History shows that the railway is not looked after by governments. Investment is turned off like a tap when money is needed elsewhere. Nationalised railways were dirty, late and not used in the same numbers as now.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Leave are subject to NINE investigations about fraud and criminality in the Referendum. Labour want to talk about railways.pic.twitter.com/L9XQ8qmUBu
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We need a Labour Party that is electable first, and the one Corbyn runs is unelectable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Looking at attending a sports event in London at a weekend but there are no later trains back. Work has been going on at the weekends for years and years and
@LNRailway advertise travelling to London at the weekends. Is that a joke?Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How are Labour going to renationalise the rail companies when they are owned by either institutional investors (pension funds) or external investors? Are we talking about forcing shareholders to sell? How does that work under international law exactly. Is it not illegal?
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.