How would the Supreme Court react to this? Reno v. ACLU was a 9-0 decision, but I dunno, I have a hard time seeing these "originalists" not throwing away the last 65 years worth of 1st Amendment jurisprudence and returning to the Hicklin Test.
Reminder: the main purpose of SISEA is to create a new legal category of "pornographic image" as defined by the staff of Senators @BenSasse and @JeffMerkley, which can then be unconstitutionally regulated into oblivion: https://twitter.com/CMYKGenet/status/1340702641748406274 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
wait we're finally banning anime? fuck yeah
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And prohibition went so well last time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The idea is to regulate all speech into oblivion, but they have to lie about it since if they were honest everyone would condemn them and not listen to them anymore.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So if it passes, do we get to create a constitutionality court test by suing prominent museums to remove “Leda and the Swan” images from their websites? Zeus in his swan cosplay, assaulting poor Leda.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.