Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

Researcher in neuroscience and metascience.

Sweden
nilsonne.net
Vrijeme pridruživanja: kolovoz 2013.
Rođen/a 1982.
29 fotografija ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @GustavNilsonne

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @GustavNilsonne

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 12 sati

    Tweeps, I’m looking for psychological studies that were attempting to be RCTs/experiments but suffered from design flaws that turned them into something else. Any ideas? Thanks!

    6 proslijeđenih tweetova 8 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 16 sati

    Don't miss to apply for travel to the 2020 in of ! Deadline: 20 March. Read more on our website: You can also check out the scholarships at .

    Time to apply for ICPSR Summer Program Scholarships!
    Korisnici , i
    4 proslijeđena tweeta 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 16 sati

    We are seeking proposals for automated data enhancement to the SCORE dataset to help assess credibility of the claims-Statistical errors, citation patterns, language use, etc. 2 pages Deadline: 29 February $100K of total funds for 4-15 grants Details:

    1 reply 11 proslijeđenih tweetova 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Types of peer review: 1) 3 anonymous scientists write secret reviews in a process that takes a few months 2) dozens of known experts write comments that anyone in the world can see hours after a paper is posted (e.g this thread 👇) Explain to me again why is 1 >> 2?

    Based on the content of my mentions, I feel like I need to further debunk crazy / HIV conspiracy preprint. This is a thread doing so. 1/9
    Prikaži ovu nit
    28 replies 118 proslijeđenih tweetova 539 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 23 sata

    2015: Immediate open access is critical for Ebola. 2016: For Zika 2019: For opioids 2020: for ... 2025: Let's stop this nonsense. It's critical for for HIV, cancer, malaria, and literally ALL RESEARCH.

    93 proslijeđena tweeta 210 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 23 sata

    Most applicants were OK with use of lottery to allocate research funding (with most support among the lucky winners)

    5 replies 43 proslijeđena tweeta 85 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    New blog post, consisting of the review I submitted for this article a bit more than a month ago: Article was rejected, but is now accepted elsewhere without substantial changes. I thought the article was relatively weak.

    Do Effect Sizes in Psychology Laboratory Experiments Mean Anything in Reality?
    9 replies 14 proslijeđenih tweetova 70 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    This action raises the obvious question: is it not our duty to do this for all research on disease?

    67 organisations, including The Lancet Group, Cell Press, and Elsevier globally, commit to sharing all relevant data on 2019-nCoV fully, freely, and immediately. Global solidarity with WHO, China, and all frontline health workers.
    6 replies 97 proslijeđenih tweetova 181 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    Blog post: Are frauds incompetent? Why I think we're only catching a fraction of data fakers, and why data forensics isn't up to the task.

    9 replies 40 proslijeđenih tweetova 98 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    I like the new Sorbonne declaration on research data rights. (But why is it an image scan that doesn't support cutting/pasting? Didn't the 9 major university consortia behind it want to help us quote & discuss its principles? And why is it undated?)

    1 reply 14 proslijeđenih tweetova 28 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    A consortium of 120 open scholarship grassroots networks prepared a NSF proposal to advance communication, coordination, & impact of individual & collective efforts. Proposal available at MetaArXiv. If/when funded, all grassroots networks will be welcome!

    44 proslijeđena tweeta 92 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    So let's get some strong theory. WE CAN'T. WE ONLY GET VAGUE INDUCTIVE GUESSES. No let's get theory. Let's *study* theory, and rope in concepts from animal behaviour, biology, physiology, the mathematics of emergence... NO THAT'S TOO MUCH WORK So then... we should just stop?

    1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 25 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    Position paper by German psych student councils () demands (1) Open Science as part of the curriculum (2) Open Access (3) critical reflection of metrics & development of alternatives (4) changes in the incentive structure 👏🏻

    5 replies 47 proslijeđenih tweetova 137 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    Uncovering this alleged data fabrication would be impossible if the data was not publicly available. An example how data sharing can lead to increasing quality of published research.

    I'm baffled by how lazy and dumb this fake data strategy is: 1. Make up some numbers for controls 2. Copy them to a new column for the treatments, and add +2 to each one Not to mention the ethical lapses involved.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    3 proslijeđena tweeta 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    I'm baffled by how lazy and dumb this fake data strategy is: 1. Make up some numbers for controls 2. Copy them to a new column for the treatments, and add +2 to each one Not to mention the ethical lapses involved.

    20 replies 90 proslijeđenih tweetova 359 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    Registered Reports are now available at ! I am delighted that we are offering this option to all of our authors.

    Register your Research
    Share the full story of your science with . Learn more➡️
    5 replies 31 proslijeđeni tweet 90 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  17. 30. sij

    Importantly, in my view, this highlights a partitioning of value to the different components. You don't need to invent a new theory to do science. (4/4)

    1 reply 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 30. sij

    One can envision a future space of research objects, callable by anyone, to connect data, analysis code, and inference procedures. (3/4)

    1 reply 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 30. sij

    This ties in with current ideas and visions about machine-readable and actionable data and code, as well as current debates on statistical inference (p-values, alpha levels etc.). (2/4)

    1 reply
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 30. sij

    I've just read this preprint on machine-readable hypotheses by and : . What they propose is very precise specification not only of hypotheses as such but also of how to decide when the hypotheses are corroborated. (1/4)

    1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

@GustavNilsonne još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·