Twiitit
- Twiitit, nykyinen sivu.
- Twiitit ja vastaukset
- Media
Olet estänyt käyttäjän @Grassr_Journals
Haluatko varmasti nähdä nämä twiitit? Twiittien näyttäminen ei poista käyttäjän @Grassr_Journals estoa.
-
Grassroots Journals uudelleentwiittasi
Microsoft Academic closing shows how fragile the infrastructure for scholarly metadata is. Fortunately, Crossref, DataCite, Dryad, OpenCitations and OurResearch are moving to adopt the Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI). …https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2021/10/27/now-is-the-time-to-work-together-toward-open-infrastructures-for-scholarly-metadata/ …
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
Grassroots Journals uudelleentwiittasiKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Grassroots Journals uudelleentwiittasi
There is now a Delightful List on
#OpenScience, a curated list of resources, organizations and free software that are supporting open science. https://www.reddit.com/r/Open_Science/comments/p62wcq/there_is_now_a_delightful_list_on_openscience_a/?utm_source=ifttt …https://codeberg.org/teaserbot-labs/delightful-open-science …Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
Grassroots Journals uudelleentwiittasi
Join us on 7/22 for a live discussion with Alexandra Elbakyan, the founder of Sci-Hub, on her experience building tools for the open science community https://www.reddit.com/r/Open_Science/comments/oofyl8/join_us_on_722_for_a_live_discussion_with/?utm_source=ifttt …https://www.crowdcast.io/e/a-discussion-on-open-science-with-alexandra-elbakyan/register …
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
Grassroots Journals uudelleentwiittasi
Impact factor abandoned by Dutch university [Utrecht] in hiring and promotion decisions.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Open_Science/comments/odjjm6/impact_factor_abandoned_by_dutch_university/?utm_source=ifttt …https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01759-5 …Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
A new communities-based pre-publication peer review system is looking for feedback. CC:
@PeerCommunityIn https://notjournals.com https://twitter.com/OpenScienceR/status/1409789909322379264 …Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
The increasing concentration of power and the surveillance of science are dangerous developments. See also: https://stoptrackingscience.eu https://twitter.com/OpenScienceR/status/1401892805912449026 …
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
Grassroots Journals uudelleentwiittasi
"The right to refuse unwanted citations: rethinking the culture of science around the citation." Peer review is not perfect. As a climatologist I can imagine some dumb article abusing my work. It would be nice to be able to signal you disagree with being…https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-021-03960-9 …
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
3) It deemphasized attribution. I am not sure this is a good rule for science (familiar product), but no attribution should be an option. 4) Focused on content. The failed Wikipedias build great platforms and expected people to automatically start using it. 3/3
Näytä tämä ketjuKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
These rules may also apply to collaborative efforts from the
#Fediverse to#FOSS and community peer review.#openScience Ad. 1) Familiar product I would love to review more than papers (software, data, journals, ...), but traditional peer review is probably a good start. 2/nNäytä tämä ketjuKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
http://niemanlab.org/2011/10/the-contribution-conundrum-why-did-wikipedia-succeed-while-other-encyclopedias-failed/ … Before Wikipedia was created there were seven similar attempts. Why did Wikipedia win? 1 Wikipedia modelled a familiar product (encyclopedia). 2 Low barriers to contribution. 3 It deemphasized attribution. 4 Focused on content, not on technology. 1/n
Näytä tämä ketjuKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
Grassroots Journals uudelleentwiittasi
We are happy to announce the launch of a new group
#TranslateScience to promote the#translation of scholarly literature. We'll also foster African#languagediversity in scholarly communication. More: https://info.africarxiv.org/launch-of-translate-science/ …#inclusion@OpenScienceR@Grassr_Journalshttps://twitter.com/OpenScienceR/status/1390292801016025094 …Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
Grassroots Journals uudelleentwiittasi
#reblog#genr 'Launch of Translate Science' https://genr.eu/wp/launch-of-translate-science/ … a new volunteer group is looking to change how translation is done in science to help bring about a more equitable global#OpenScience - there are weekly biweekly meetings - join the calls!#TranslateSciencepic.twitter.com/DDb75qwTOS
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
Grassroots Journals uudelleentwiittasi
great to see this contribution to
#KnowledgeJustice - language translation in science has been neglected for sooooo long#TranslateScience | Oh look - we have the internet to help fix this problem - go#openscience communities | A new community launch - join the biweekly meetingKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
We launched a new group to promote the translation of the scientific literature. In my own post I write about how I changed from thinking English is just a basic science skill like statistics to starting this group due to my work as climatologist. https://variable-variability.blogspot.com/2021/05/launched-new-group-translations-scientific-literature.html …https://twitter.com/OpenScienceR/status/1390292801016025094 …
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
Grassroots Journals uudelleentwiittasi
Video promoted by John Stossel for Earth Day relies on incorrect and misleading claims about climate change https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/video-promoted-by-john-stossel-for-earth-day-relies-on-incorrect-and-misleading-claims-about-climate-change/ … via
@ClimateFdbkKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
Found several interesting collaborative writing tools for scientists at
#OABarcamp21. Will try them out. Free, Markdown based, with references. https://www.zettlr.com Similar, but looks less technical. https://sciflow.net Proprietary, Wiki-based.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confluence_(software) …Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
Grassroots Journals uudelleentwiittasi
My thought is that this is an ill-conceived project and its been reported that it has co-opted people's reputation by listing them in roles they don't have with the organization so my feedback is you should probably shut it down now.https://twitter.com/curatescience/status/1371927285998231561 …
Thoughts, comments, and feedback welcome! **Thanks to @dominik_lenda @hpashler@mikemorrison who helped with or provided feedback on the design, development, and conduct of the audits.
Näytä tämä ketjuNäytä tämä ketjuKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
#OpenResearchFuture#OpenScience Previously@DFG_public had made using bibliographic measures for research assessment illegal. http://variable-variability.blogspot.com/2016/09/publish-or-perish-is-illegal-in-germany.html … But they removed this in the newest ethics guidelines. So use of the Impact Factor & Co. may actually get worse.Näytä tämä ketjuKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa -
#OpenResearchFuture Moin Syed@syeducation predicts the Impact Factor will go away in the next 5 years. I am sceptical. Universities are forced into using them via university rankings (which I would not mind being illegal).Näytä tämä ketjuKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.