Ok, now I think owner is out $100. Total of $70 for item he no longer has for sale and $30 change he gave.https://twitter.com/Omaholic/status/983535122027831297 …
-
-
Replying to @tomkracinovich
I see what you guys are saying, and I understand the argument for $100. But if he’s making a marginal sale he otherwise wouldn’t have, he gains $20 on that transaction. The full $70 of goods should only be counted if he can’t restock them again and misses out on another sale.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Omaholic
What about his other costs, or are they included in the $50?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tomkracinovich
@Grange95 Which other costs, like overhead? I don’t think the theft/sale impacts those. I’m not sure I understand your question.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Omaholic @tomkracinovich
All costs—cost of goods, overhead, taxes, etc.—are in the $50. So $70 means $20 profit on the sale.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Grange95 @tomkracinovich
I think the owner should just mark all the rest of the goods down to $50 and sell at cost so he can figure out his books.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Grange95 @tomkracinovich
hahahahaha that’s one of my favorite random lines
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I agree. I’ve only seen one episode and this was it.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.