8/ Prop bet: Justice Breyer will ask a long, convoluted hypothetical question about recreational marijuana that will confuse everyone, including himself.
18/ The sleeper resolution is the "equal sovereignty" argument--Why can NV have nice things like sports betting, but NJ can't?
-
-
19/ The parties have focused on commandeering, but amicus briefs raised the equal sovereignty issue. It would give the Court a way to avoid the commandeering issue, and let NJ have state-regulated sports betting in casinos, a la NV.
Show this thread -
20/ If the justices show interest in the equal sovereignty argument, New Jersey's in-game odds go way up.
Show this thread -
21/ So, key things to watch for in argument: * Concerns about recreational marijuana * Skepticism about "limited repeal" funneling sports betting to casinos * Interest in equal sovereignty
Show this thread -
22/ As for key players, Ted Olson for NJ is a SCOTUS Hall-of-Famer, but Paul Clement for the leagues is possibly the best modern SCOTUS advocate. This is Aaron Rodgers v. Tom Brady level lawyering.
Show this thread -
23/ Also, Clement is a respected conservative. He knows how to frame arguments for the conservative judges and has credibility with them. So, slight edge to leagues.
Show this thread -
24/ IMHO, the leagues are a slight favorite to win if it's a commandeering case. NJ is slight favorite if equal sovereignty gets traction.
Show this thread -
25/ Anyway, it's exciting for sports betting to have a real shot at SCOTUS. Enjoy the show, and check back with
@DustinGouker in a few hours for the game highlights.Show this thread -
26/ And follow
@McCannSportsLaw and@SportsLawProf for detailed legal analysis in the post-game show brought to you by the Las Vegas Raiders.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.