still don't get it ... why is appointing a Supreme Court judge considered an ongoing presidential success?
Because it may lock in 4 decades of conservative jurisprudence, and a SCOTUS veto over future progressive legislation.
-
-
I understand the impact, but it’s still just part of the job. Maybe McConnell deserves points for stealing the seat, but Trump ...?
-
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.