Borgata already gets $10 mil from Phil Ivey. They want $10 million more from the card manufacturers tho https://www.njgamblingsites.com/8390/borgata-gemaco-baccarat-suit/ …
Good question. Damages must be reasonably foreseeable in tort case. Depends what a jury thinks.
-
-
Along same lines, Gemaco might be on hook for comps associated with baccarat play even though Ivey was not.
-
There are differences in what damages can be recovered in contract (Ivey) and tort (Gemaco). Might not align perfectly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.