: You know that is not how they'll approach this. Look for companion legislation that uses police powers to add restrictions.
-
-
Replying to @DavidPurdum
I'm sure they will try to restrict. But they can't limit to just casinos/tracks, and the public only supports that limit.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Grange95
: definitely will be interesting to see how politics play out. Maybe the threat brings leagues to table? Good for your profession.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidPurdum @Grange95
There's A LOT of space between Monmouth Park saying NJ going nuclear and Christie (or the next governor) signing a bill.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DustinGouker @Grange95
: No one disagrees. However, they wouldn't do it if they thought there wasn't value in doing so.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidPurdum @Grange95
We also have the dynamic that NJ voters just soundly rejected an expansion of gambling in the state in November.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DustinGouker @Grange95
: And in 2011 NJ voters overwhelmingly approved legalization of sports betting. Guess we'll just have to see.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Wouldn't anyone wanting to operate still be required to acquire all applicable business/Gaming licenses? State/county/city?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
there would be no gaming licenses that anyone would need to acquire under this model.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ok, wondering how strict it would become on a business license then
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Presumably every tavern and convenience store could take wagers. Can't require license or limit to casinos.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.