Although league atty Paul Clement says "not cert-worthy," NJ has stronger commandeering argument than in Christie I.https://twitter.com/wallachlegal/status/809972567968780288 …
I do understand your point. You've bought the NJ propaganda rather than independently analyzing the legal arguments.
-
-
If you care to articulate what's NEW in Christie II (Hint: Nada), then we can debate legal merits.
-
Reality is Christie II is same as Christie I from constitutional perspective: Can NJ authorize sports bets ONLY in casinos?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.