Although league atty Paul Clement says "not cert-worthy," NJ has stronger commandeering argument than in Christie I.https://twitter.com/wallachlegal/status/809972567968780288 …
Not "in circles" at all. What's the NEW commandeering argument? Please identify it. (Hint: There is none.)
-
-
NJ in Christie I: "We want sports betting in casinos." NJ in Christie II: "We want sports betting in casinos." New argument?!?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.