DFS under PASPA was not at issue in CA3, neither argued by parties nor decided by court. SCOTUS won't take this issue up. https://twitter.com/wallachlegal/status/784046042727591937 …
DFS was NOT in CA3 opinions as an issue. Don't recall DFS as a stated issue in any briefs.
-
-
its in christie 1 as unclean hands argued by NJTHA and discussed (and rejected as meritless) in opinion
-
SCOTUS only looks at Christie II for this cert petition. Won't grant an issue not decided by CA3 in en band decision.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.