away IS the objective;if that can't be done w/o hitting people, so be it.Assuming that's correct reading, how is it objectionable?
Yes, I agree that statement can, depending on circumstances, support a defense of self-defense/necessity.
-
-
Excellent. We also agree that "run them down, whether or not necessary for your self-defense" is advocating criminal action, yes?
-
Probably (tricky issues of mens rea). But for our purposes, that statement is likely to generate a jury question on recklessness
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.